Business cards for photographers

If you are into photography, as I am, at some point you will have either already thought about, or will now you’ve read this post, getting a business card designed.  My first photography business card came from Vistaprint and I liked the design so much that I had a graphic designer do a similar style with my own images when I was ready to update.  All the photos are mine and most reflect the region I live in.  The brigher side is the front and the lighter side the back.  Means I can write on it, or the recipient can.
My business card

I thought that if you’re looking for ideas you might like to see what others have done. Some choose to use their photos on their cards and others choose not to.

This one and others was listed at slodive.com

Wedding Photography Business Card

This one and others at the Mooblog.

me by moo

And 12 different ideas about cards at photojojo.com

front-back-500

And if you’re still not sure there is a great book to read about business cards by Ivan Misner called It’s In The Cards’ – great for all sorts of ideas, not just for photographers.

Great use of a fisheye lens

I hang around various forums online. Not all are photography forums, some relate to my work as a Virtual Assistant and others relate to things of interest, and in this case, mountain biking. Regular readers will know that my husband is a mountain biker but currently not participating in events as he’s recovering from a serious accident of over 5 months ago.

However we did go visit his Team Sally mates at the Rockhop 2011 MTB Enduro last Sunday and while there I took over 600 photos of the riders and have now posted some of those shots online for viewing and purchase. I was chatting at the Rotorburn forum (MTB) to let them know I’d been at the event but also to catch up with the chats there and discovered some fellow photographers in a couple of threads. One thread in particular had a great link to a blog post about a photo taken in Austria using a fisheye lens. Now it’s got me wondering if I should get one :-)

Tristan says:

This photo was taken on June 3, 2008, and despite the many questions I’ve been asked surrounding the way it looks, I can confirm that no, it is not fake.

In 2008 I spent 6 months travelling through Europe. I’d just turned 18, I’d just finished school, and I was just desperate to get out of Sydney to explore the world. So I did what many people my age do; I booked a one-way flight to Europe. While there I spent time in Italy, France, Germany, Switzerland, the Czech Republic, Netherlands, Slovakia, Vatican City, Scotland and England (technically not Europe but close enough for me), and Austria, which is where this photo was taken.  Click here to read the rest and see the picture he’s talking about.

Lulu.com – they are listening

Further to my two recent posts about concerns that people could use images created by other people for photobooks, I’ve had this answer – they are listening and you can add your voice too!

Thank you for your email. At this time, Lulu is not removing this option. However, It is only through customer feedback such as yours, that we can continue to improve our products and services to meet your highest expectations. I will be more than happy to address your concern for copyright to our product team.

So if you’re concerned about the possibility of your photos being used in someone else’s photobook, make sure you do speak up!

Wrong answer Lulu.com

Many saw my post last week about using other people’s photos when using Print on Demand services.  I got comments via my blog as well as at Facebook, Twitter and photography forums I belong to.  I had queried Lulu.com and they’ve sent back an answer.  In the meantime I’ve discovered other photobook printing services also offering the same with links to other photo service sites.

What did Lulu.com say?

Thank you for your email. We give authors that option so they can upload their images from Fotolia.com. If you see someone publishing your work, please let us know and we will take action on that issue. Lulu.com is a self-book publishing print on demand company and we do not review the content. Most people who use Lulu make photo books of their trips, family gatherings etc. Please let me know if you have any further questions.

What did I say in response?

Why can’t they just upload from their computers then, instead of an external service?

And you do promote that they can search through over 5 million photos at Fotolio as I showed in my previous email (and as shown in the attached). It is a concern for those of us who do photography on a professional or semi-professional level.

While I don’t expect I’ll be listened to as an individual, if photographers band together to voice their concern, then perhaps that might be considered.  The image I attached to my response above is below.

Using other people's photos

I received during the week, a lovely letter from a man who had visited my photography exhibition.  He would have seen it in the local paper.  He was the same man I took photos of some baby Tawny Frogmouths for late last year when the family was in his garden.  He was thrilled to see photos of these birds on display at the exhibition and felt that he had, in a small way, contributed to my exhibition.

He loved the photobook I had on display but was disappointed he couldn’t buy it and was asking if it was possible for me to get several printed.  What a lovely surprise to get that letter.  I checked with the company that produced that book for me but it would cost me over $40 to reproduce more copies and I felt that might be a bit much to ask of others so set out finding a service online that might do it cheaper for me.  I went to lulu.com as I have used them successfully in the past for other books.  However, as I began setting up the photobook, imagine my surprise when they gave a direct link to Fotolio encouraging their clients to use that service to source photos for their photobooks.  Huh?  Surely that’s not right. Many people produce books to sell via Lulu.com (as I plan to) and don’t think they should be selling books with other people’s work in it.  A quick check of their Terms of Service showed that people were not allowed to do that, and yet here they are encouraging people to create books that could well be sold in their system.

I immediately wrote a letter to them via email explaining my concern as a working photographer.  I told them that it would be rare/unusual for anyone who had taken the photos themselves to download via Fotolio when they could upload from their own computers, so it would be those who don’t own the photos who would be accessing them from Fotolio. And are they doing anything to police their rules relating to non-sale of books using other people’s work that may be copyrighted?  I wait for their response.

I wouldn’t be happy to see someone else selling a photobook filled with photos I took and I doubt that any other photographer would either.  What are your thoughts?

Photography Glossary

I mentioned Australian Photography Magazine a couple of weeks ago. They have launched a new website AustralianPhotography.com with competitions, events, exhibitions and lots of other things listed.  On it is a very useful glossary on photography that I thought you might find useful.

It also mentions some famous photographers, both present and in the past.  I belong to another group which has a photographic challenge each month and we have to produce an image in the likeness of a famous photographer’s style or with a particular topic, i.e. black on black for example (at the time of writing this I was still thinking on that).

One month was in the likeness of Henri Cartier-Bresson who progressed from painting to photography and in particular, black-and-white imagery and photojournalism. This photo to the right was my entry for that particular month topic.  It was taken on the weir wall at Lysterfield Lake Park.

I really enjoying learning so much about this much loved hobby, addiction, pastime and lifetime vocation of photography.

What do you enjoy about photography the most?